Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Main subject
Language
Year range
1.
Scientific and Research Journal of Army University of Medical Sciences-JAUMS. 2005; 3 (4): 701-703
in Persian | IMEMR | ID: emr-75031

ABSTRACT

Regarding to the importance of the portal vein diameter and inadequate knowledge of it in our county and due to determining its normal values, this survey was performed in patient visiting Loghman Hakim medical center within 1383. The portal vein diameter was measured using ultrasonography [Aloka Japan] which has a phased array convex 3.5 MHz, and was compared according to sex standard values in main text books and articles. The portal diameter vein was 9.56 +/- 1.71, major right branch was 6.44 +/- 0.89 and major left branch was 5.61 +/- 0.87. The obtained values for all three variables were more in males than females [P<0.0001]. It seems that normal values obtained for males were different with standard values, whereas obtained values and standard values were cmpatible in females


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Portal Vein/diagnostic imaging
2.
Scientific and Research Journal of Army University of Medical Sciences-JAUMS. 2005; 3 (12): 701-703
in Persian | IMEMR | ID: emr-202494

ABSTRACT

Background: Regarding to the importance of the portal vein diameter and inadequate knowledge of it in our county and due to determining its normal values, this survey was performed in patient visiting Loghman Hakim medical center within 1383


Materials and methods: The portal vein diameter was measured using ultrasonography [Aloka Japan I] which has a phased array convex 3.5 MHz, and was compared according to sex standard values in main text books and articles


Results: The portal diameter vein was 9.56+/-1.71, major right brach was 6.44+/- 0.89 and major left branch was 5.61+/-0.87. The obtained values for all three variables were more in males than females [P<0.0001]


Conclusions: It seems that normal values obtained for males were different with standard values, whereas obtained values and standard values were cmpatible in females

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL